Runtime Authority & Orchestration Evidence Dashboard
Static insight surface for runtime authority validation, enforcement improvement, and orchestration evidence gaps. The 104/104 result is a dated bounded validation snapshot.
104/104
validation tests
74/74
baseline tests
30/30
smoke tests
8/8
runtime control surfaces
It shows what was validated, what improved in runtime authority behavior, and which evidence fields are still missing before orchestration can be treated as proven.
The core validation metric is strong, but it is still a validation metric, not a behavior metric. Behavior insight requires before/after deltas and execution provenance.
Actual multi-worker orchestration trace is not yet shown.
Single-worker detection is not yet instrumented per task.
Reviewer, receipt, QA, and owner-gate evidence is not yet displayed per task.
Before runtime authority validation
2026-06-09 to 2026-06-10What existed
Governance rules, reviewer-enforcement lessons, and single-worker / false-orchestration risk diagnosis existed as prior AIOS context.
What changed
Runtime authority had not yet been summarized as a public-safe validation evidence surface.
Evidence available
Earlier AIOS enforcement and orchestration-review records; exact task-level runtime dashboard evidence remains separate.
Improvement
AIOS had clearer claim-boundary discipline and recognized that role labels are not orchestration proof.
Still not proven
No public-safe runtime authority validation page, no worker-level proof matrix, and no trend dashboard.
After registry / authority contract acceptance
2026-06-11What existed
Registry / authority contract context was accepted for the static public snapshot, and stale pending-owner wording could be removed.
What changed
The public page no longer needs to frame Window A owner acceptance as pending for this snapshot context.
Evidence available
Owner instruction plus summarized validation evidence; no raw registry packet or private paths are published.
Improvement
The public copy can focus on evidence and gaps instead of preserving a stale blocker.
Still not proven
This does not prove production readiness, live monitoring, universal enforcement, or full orchestration proof.
After runtime authority validation
2026-06-11What existed
Runtime authority validation passed with 104/104 total tests, including 74/74 baseline tests and 30/30 smoke tests.
What changed
Eight runtime control surfaces became validated in bounded scope and safe to summarize publicly.
Evidence available
Source reports summarized: final handoff, test evidence summary, safe claims, forbidden claims, and remaining limits.
Improvement
Validation evidence now shows what was checked: registry consumption, dormant blocking, receipt semantics, human gates, local-only downgrade, staging boundary, hook delegation, and sanitizer behavior.
Still not proven
Actual multi-worker orchestration trace, repeated dashboard snapshots, and live runtime state are still not shown.
Next required dashboard state
date to be confirmedWhat existed
A static insight page can show what evidence exists and what remains missing.
What changed
A future dashboard needs structured records for task routing, actual workers, receipts, reviewers, QA, owner gates, and repeat snapshots.
Evidence available
To be created as public-safe structured data; raw receipts, private notes, local paths, and test logs must remain excluded.
Improvement
The dashboard can begin answering whether runtime authority and orchestration enforcement are improving AIOS behavior.
Still not proven
Dashboard behavior insight remains incomplete until execution provenance and repeated evidence records are populated.
| Improvement area | Why it matters | Before state | After state | Remaining limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canonical registry consumption | Runtime decisions need a source of truth for skill status. | Registry state could be referenced manually or inconsistently. | Registry Reader validation confirms registry parsing and status detection in bounded scope. | Dashboard still needs structured registry status fields and repeated snapshots. |
| Dormant skill blocking | Parked or killed skills should not be treated as active. | Dormant status could be missed or treated as documentation only. | Smoke tests validate dormant skill blocking behavior. | Does not prove production blocking or CASE-003 execution. |
| Receipt semantics | Missing receipts should not become proof. | Receipt requirements could be described but not displayed as a dashboard evidence field. | Receipt creation and blocking semantics are validated for bounded use. | Future dashboard needs receipt status per task and public-safe receipt references. |
| Human gate semantics | High-risk actions need owner escalation instead of autonomous approval. | Human gate rules existed as policy expectations. | Validation confirms owner-gate escalation and autonomous authority blocking behavior. | Does not prove future owner decisions or production gate operation. |
| Local-only downgrade semantics | Simulation or local-only work should not be mistaken for independent proof. | Local execution could be overread as orchestration. | Validation confirms local-only downgrade behavior. | Dashboard still needs explicit single-worker and local-only classification per task. |
| Staging-only worker boundary | Worker evidence should not self-promote into canonical or production paths. | Worker output could be confused with authority evidence if not bounded. | optimize-worker integration validates staging-only writes. | Does not prove production deployment or universal worker compliance. |
| Thin hook consumer behavior | Hooks should consume authority decisions rather than become hidden policy engines. | Hook logic could drift from registry authority. | Pre-commit and pre-push hooks validate delegation to Registry Reader. | Dashboard needs hook mode and actual enforcement status per snapshot. |
| Sanitizer behavior | Public surfaces need redaction before publication. | Raw paths, receipts, identifiers, or private details could leak if copied directly. | Sanitizer behavior is validated for paths, identifiers, and sensitive detail removal. | Public output still needs rendered-output scans and reviewer gate before publication. |
Each item is an evidence dimension, not an asserted universal current behavior. The value map says what bounded validation demonstrated and what a dashboard should track next.
Orchestration proof is not complete unless actual worker, routing decision, reviewer receipt, and owner gate are shown. This matrix keeps validation evidence separate from orchestration proof.
| Task / evidence area | Expected role | Actual worker shown? | Reviewer shown? | Receipt shown? | Owner gate shown? | Orchestration verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Runtime validation evidence | Runtime Authority lens | Validation results shown | Not task-level | Summarized only | Owner-cleared snapshot context | validation evidence shown; orchestration not proven |
| Public safety evidence | QA / public-safety lens | Sanitized output shown | Summarized gate evidence only | Raw receipts excluded | Owner review target | public safety evidence shown |
| Actual multi-worker orchestration trace | Orchestration Evidence lens | Not yet shown | Not task-level | Not yet shown | Not per task | orchestration planned but not proven |
| Single-worker detection | Data Team / QA lens | Not yet instrumented | Not yet instrumented | Not yet instrumented | Not yet instrumented | evidence gap |
| Future dashboard provenance | Data Team | Required field | Required field | Required field | Required field | next instrumentation required |
Classification precedence: evidence missing, local-only downgraded, orchestration planned but not proven, single-worker confirmed, orchestrated confirmed. Stronger claims require stronger evidence.
orchestrated_confirmed
Requires actual worker, routing decision, reviewer receipt when required, QA status, and owner gate status where applicable.
single_worker_confirmed
Use when one worker handled implementation, review, QA, and closeout, or role labels exist without independent role evidence.
orchestration_planned_but_not_proven
Use when expected roles or proposed workers exist but actual worker, reviewer, receipt, or QA evidence is incomplete.
evidence_missing
Use when core proof fields are absent, evidence links are missing, or source reports cannot be tied to a task.
local_only_downgraded
Use when local simulation or Codex-only validation is useful but cannot count as independent orchestration proof.
Validation test evidence
Strong104/104 validation tests, including 74/74 baseline and 30/30 smoke tests.
Public-safety sanitization
StrongLocal paths, raw receipts, private notes, session identifiers, secrets, and test logs are excluded.
Runtime execution trace
Weak / missingThe page does not yet show per-task actual worker trace or routing decision history.
Model/provider receipt visibility
PartialReviewer-gate receipt metadata exists for the redesign analysis, but raw receipts are not rendered publicly.
Reviewer gate visibility
PartialReviewer result is summarized at gate level; task-level reviewer proof is not displayed.
Live monitoring
Not presentThis is a static insight dashboard with no live data feed.
104/104 is a validation metric, not a behavior metric.
Useful dashboard insight requires before/after deltas, repeated snapshots, task-level routing records, and execution provenance.
Separate validation, behavior, orchestration, and claim-boundary layers so the page can be scanned without overreading validation as proof of orchestration.
Make “not proven yet” visible rather than hidden in footnotes or caveats.
- Runtime Authority validation passed in bounded scope with 104/104 validation tests.
- The static page summarizes validation evidence and evidence gaps.
- Public-safe output excludes raw receipts, private notes, local paths, session identifiers, secrets, and test logs.
- Runtime Authority validation improved evidence around registry consumption, dormant blocking, receipt semantics, human gates, local-only downgrade, staging boundaries, hook delegation, and sanitizer behavior.
- Full orchestration proof remains incomplete until execution provenance is displayed.
- No live monitoring claim.
- No production readiness claim.
- No universal enforcement claim.
- No CASE-003 execution claim.
- No Benchmark Dataset v0.1 export claim.
- No full orchestration proof claim without actual worker, routing decision, reviewer receipt, and owner gate evidence.