UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Curated static review snapshot reconciled through 20 July 2026.

This page is an under-construction AIOS operating surface and does not indicate CASE-003 execution, real data ingestion, derivative creation, Benchmark Dataset v0.1 export, production monitoring, live monitoring, or public proof readiness.

This is a public-safe static AIOS monitoring review surface. It displays curated/exported enforcement status only. It is not live telemetry, not a production monitoring dashboard, and not realtime agent tracking.

Public-safe monitoring surface

AIOS Monitoring Review Surface

Monitoring makes AIOS governance visible: whether routing and enforcement policies were followed, whether provider/model/token/cost receipts are present or missing, whether role boundaries were respected, which claims are valid or downgraded, and which role owns the next action.

The page is intentionally public-safe. It does not show local file paths, raw receipts, secrets, provider keys, private cost detail, private task logs, or confidential workflow details.

Current remote-verified state

Under-construction content verified at public route

Verified route

sararin.ai/architecture/system-health/monitoring

Current boundary

Dashboard is public under-construction only.

Remote-verified means the public route is reachable and the deployed build includes the expected under-construction dashboard content. It does not verify production monitoring, live telemetry, public proof, CASE-003 execution, real data ingestion, derivative authorization, benchmark export, benchmark completion, or full multi-model proof.

Push status

Current under-construction state already reflected in deployed build. Future changes require push readiness review.

Not proof of

This is not production readiness, live monitoring readiness, public proof readiness, CASE-003 execution, real data ingestion, derivative authorization, benchmark export, benchmark completion, or full multi-model proof.

Latest verified state: Latest verified state includes the gap-closure evidence view, current-vs-legacy visibility, Controls moved to DONE_USED_ONCE, Gaps still unproven, compact evidence rows, benchmark baseline metrics, and bounded Opus critic wording.

Current state vs historical snapshot

Current section

The current section reflects the latest verified dashboard state for the public route. It is the owner-facing answer for what is true now.

Historical section

The historical section preserves older public-safe monitoring records for context. It may include historical parked/deferred states and should not be read as the current gap-closure register.

Override rule

Historical statuses do not override the current remote-verified state. CASE-specific execution statuses are separate from the NO_PARK_MODE gap-closure register.

Owner verdict

Public under-construction AIOS operating surface. Current proof level: local Codex implementation validation only. Guardrails are active for claim boundary, owner gate, route status, blocked actions, and evidence gaps. External review was not run, so this page must not be treated as multi-model orchestration proof.

What is this page?

Public under-construction AIOS operating surface

Current proof level

Local validation only

Raw value: LOCAL_VALIDATION_ONLY

Enforced guardrails

Claim boundary, owner gate, route status, blocked actions, evidence gaps, exact disclaimer, and local validation visibility.

Improve next

Add reviewer-gate evidence or external review coverage before claiming stronger proof.

Not claimed: Production readiness, live monitoring readiness, public proof readiness, CASE-003 execution, real data ingestion, derivative authorization, benchmark export, and multi-model orchestration proof.

Proof level

Local validation

Local validation only

Raw value: LOCAL_VALIDATION_ONLY

Codex local checks passed. This is useful implementation evidence, not independent proof.

Multi-model proof

Not claimed

Raw value: MULTI_MODEL_PROOF_NOT_CLAIMED

No external model/provider review is being presented as orchestration proof.

External review

Not run

Raw value: EXTERNAL_REVIEW_NOT_RUN

External reviewer coverage is currently 0%, so stronger proof remains blocked.

Public surface

Under construction only

Raw value: PUBLIC_UNDER_CONSTRUCTION_ONLY

The page can be reviewed publicly, but it is not production, live, or proof-ready.

Routing Layer Check: Right Role / Right Model / Right Task

This section is a declared static configuration view, not a runtime probe. It checks whether the selected worker/model is appropriate for the task risk. Raw routing values are shown as secondary evidence, not as the main owner-facing status.

Task / gate	Task risk	Expected role	Recommended worker	Actual worker	Routing verdict	Evidence / receipt	Owner conclusion
Public dashboard UI patch	Public under-construction route/page patch	Implementation worker	Codex local	Codex local	Correct worker selected Raw value: ROUTE_MATCH	Local diff, typecheck, build, route HTTP check	Correct worker for bounded repo/page implementation.
Public claim boundary review	Public wording and claim safety	QA / reviewer	QA reviewer or Opus gate if stronger confidence is required	Codex local validation only	Local-only with downgrade Raw value: LOCAL_ONLY_JUSTIFIED_WITH_DOWNGRADE	Local scan and rendered disclaimer check; no external receipt	Acceptable for under-construction local validation, but not independent proof.
Multi-model orchestration proof	High-risk proof claim	External reviewer / provider receipt evidence	Opus gate / QA reviewer / Data Team if needed	Not run	Not claimed Raw value: DOWNGRADED_UNVERIFIED	No provider/model receipt	Multi-model proof claim is not allowed because external review was not run. The dashboard remains valid as an under-construction local-validation surface.
Owner decision	Scope and push/deployment boundary	Lyn / Owner	Human owner gate	Owner approval recorded only for bounded public under-construction scope	Scope boundary approved Raw value: OWNER_APPROVED_SCOPE_BOUNDARY	Owner approval in task instruction; no production/live/public-proof approval	Owner approves scope, not production/live/public-proof readiness.

Orchestration reality check

Was orchestration required?

Yes, for public-surface claim safety, but proportionate to the bounded patch.

Raw value: REQUIRED_FOR_HIGH_RISK

Was orchestration designed?

Designed with constraints: local implementation plus visible downgrade for missing external review.

Raw value: DESIGNED_WITH_CONSTRAINTS

Who executed?

Implementation worker: Codex local.

Raw value: CODEX_LOCAL

Was external review run?

No. External reviewer was not run.

Raw value: EXTERNAL_REVIEW_NOT_RUN

Was QA independent or local-only?

Local-only. QA was Codex validation, not independent reviewer proof.

Raw value: LOCAL_QA_ONLY

Was local-only execution justified?

Yes for bounded under-construction UI work, with stronger proof blocked.

Raw value: LOCAL_ONLY_JUSTIFIED

Was the claim downgraded correctly?

Yes. Multi-model proof is not claimed.

Raw value: MULTI_MODEL_PROOF_NOT_CLAIMED

What is Lyn's role?

Owner monitor and challenge gate, not orchestration engine.

Raw value: OWNER_MONITOR_NOT_ORCHESTRATION_ENGINE

Compact evidence rows

These rows are the static proof-of-use record for this gap-closure workflow. They combine route, role, reviewer, claim, downgrade, owner gate, and next-action evidence in one compact row per task.

Task	Risk	Expected role	Actual worker	Model route	Reviewer	QA	Claim / proof / downgrade	Owner gate	Next action
Dashboard UX implementation Raw value: dashboard-ux-implementation	LEVEL_2_HIGH_RISK public under-construction dashboard UX	Codex implementation executor	Codex local	Codex local Data Visualizer, QA Visual Reviewer, Opus critic if available Owner authorized bounded dashboard UX gap-closure scope. Codex is the correct worker for repo/page implementation.	LOCAL_ONLY_VALIDATION	PENDING_LOCAL_VALIDATION	UNDER_CONSTRUCTION_PUBLIC_SURFACE LOCAL_VALIDATION_ONLY INDEPENDENT_UX_PROOF_NOT_CLAIMED app/architecture/system-health/monitoring/page.tsx; lib/aios-monitoring-snapshot.ts	OWNER_APPROVED_BOUNDED_SCOPE	Run typecheck, build, route, disclaimer, claim, secret, and layout validation.
Data Visualizer / UX readability review Raw value: data-visualizer-ux-readability-review	LEVEL_2_HIGH_RISK owner-facing public surface readability	Data Visualizer / UX Readability Reviewer	Codex local applying committed Data Visualizer rules	Codex local checklist Data Visualizer reviewer, UX Readability Reviewer, Opus critic Independent Data Visualizer reviewer is not run in this local gate, so the page discloses local-only validation.	REVIEW_NOT_RUN	LOCAL_ONLY_VALIDATION	LOCAL_VALIDATION_ONLY INDEPENDENT_UX_PROOF_NOT_CLAIMED INDEPENDENT_UX_PROOF_NOT_CLAIMED Downloads HTML report; rendered route validation after local server check	OWNER_MONITOR_NOT_ORCHESTRATION_ENGINE	Keep Data Visualizer proof gap visible until an independent reviewer runs.
QA Visual review Raw value: qa-visual-review	LEVEL_2_HIGH_RISK visual readability and overflow check	QA Visual Reviewer	Codex local visual/layout validation	Codex local validation QA Visual Reviewer, browser screenshot check, Opus if wording ambiguity remains Independent QA Visual Reviewer is not run in this local gate; overflow and collision safeguards are checked locally.	REVIEW_NOT_RUN	LOCAL_ONLY_VALIDATION	LOCAL_VALIDATION_ONLY INDEPENDENT_QA_PROOF_NOT_CLAIMED INDEPENDENT_QA_PROOF_NOT_CLAIMED Downloads HTML report; local route visual/readability checks	OWNER_MONITOR_NOT_ORCHESTRATION_ENGINE	Use viewport/layout validation and keep independent QA proof unclaimed.
Claim-boundary / Opus critic review if available Raw value: claim-boundary-opus-critic-review	LEVEL_2_HIGH_RISK public claim wording and proof boundary	Opus critic / claim-boundary reviewer	OpenRouter Opus 4.7 critic pass	Opus critic pass (single strong model, bounded scope) QA reviewer, Sonnet synthesis, Codex local claim scan Opus was used as one bounded critic gate for wording and claim-boundary critique, not as multi-model orchestration proof.	CRITIC_PASS_COMPLETE	LOCAL_CLAIM_SCAN_REQUIRED	CRITIC_EVIDENCE_ONLY MULTI_MODEL_PROOF_NOT_CLAIMED MULTI_MODEL_PROOF_NOT_CLAIMED OPUS_CRITIC_REVIEW_RESULT.md and provider_receipt.json in the Downloads review packet	OWNER_MONITOR_NOT_ORCHESTRATION_ENGINE	Run Opus critic only if proportionate; otherwise keep local-only downgrade visible.
Owner monitoring Raw value: owner-monitoring	OWNER_DECISION_BOUNDARY	Lyn / Owner monitor	Lyn owner approval for bounded scope	Human owner gate No model fallback for protected owner decisions Owner approval covers bounded dashboard UX implementation only and does not authorize push or stronger claims.	OWNER_MONITOR	NOT_APPLICABLE	OWNER_APPROVED_BOUNDED_SCOPE_ONLY OWNER_APPROVAL_IS_NOT_PROOF PUBLIC_PROOF_NOT_CLAIMED Owner instruction for this gate; Downloads HTML report	OWNER_APPROVED_BOUNDED_SCOPE	Current under-construction state already reflected in deployed build. Future changes require push readiness review.

Controls moved to DONE_USED_ONCE

These controls were used once in this workflow where evidence supports it. This does not mean repeated effectiveness is proven.

route/model fit visibility

Routing Layer Check shows expected role, recommended worker/model, actual worker/model, routing verdict, evidence, and owner conclusion.

Used once in this workflow where evidence supports it; repeated effectiveness is not proven.

compact evidence rows

Five compact evidence rows were created for implementation, Data Visualizer / UX review, QA Visual review, Opus critic review, and owner monitoring.

Used once as proof-of-use visibility; this is not Benchmark Dataset v0.1 export or benchmark completion.

claim downgrade / proof visibility

Local-only validation, missing independent review, and MULTI_MODEL_PROOF_NOT_CLAIMED are visible.

Claims are downgraded where evidence is missing; this does not prove stronger orchestration.

owner-gate overuse tracking

Owner role is shown as monitor/challenge gate, not orchestration engine.

Used once in this workflow; owner-gate overuse reduction needs repeated workflow tracking.

bounded Opus critic route

Opus critic pass (single strong model, bounded scope) is recorded as CRITIC_PASS_COMPLETE.

This is bounded critic evidence only; this is not full multi-model proof. MULTI_MODEL_PROOF_NOT_CLAIMED remains the correct claim boundary.

Gaps still unproven

These remain open proof gaps and must not be treated as completed.

Gap	Status	Why it matters
independent Data Visualizer review	Raw value: REVIEW_NOT_RUN	Owner-facing information hierarchy and enum translation still need independent visualizer review before claiming stronger UX proof.
independent QA Visual review	Raw value: REVIEW_NOT_RUN	Overflow, collision, disclaimer visibility, and status clarity have local checks only, not independent QA Visual proof.
repeated workflow effectiveness metrics	Raw value: NOT_PROVEN	Controls were used once, but repeated workflow evidence is required before treating them as effective.
runtime routing telemetry	Raw value: NOT_IMPLEMENTED	The page shows declared static route/model evidence, not live runtime routing telemetry.
screenshot-based overflow audit because Playwright was unavailable locally	Raw value: NOT_RUN	Local layout safeguards are present, but screenshot automation was unavailable for this gate.

Opus critic pass (single strong model, bounded scope)

Evidence status: CRITIC_PASS_COMPLETE

This is bounded critic evidence only; this is not full multi-model proof. MULTI_MODEL_PROOF_NOT_CLAIMED remains the correct claim boundary.

Enforcement scorecard

Control	Status	Owner-readable meaning
Claim boundary enforced	PASS	The page says what it does not prove.
Exact disclaimer visible	PASS	The required sentence remains visible verbatim.
Route status captured	PASS	Local-only execution is disclosed and bounded.
Routing level captured	PASS	Public surface work is treated as high-risk.
Owner gate captured	PASS	Owner approval covers bounded under-construction scope only.
Blocked actions visible	PASS	Push, production, live, proof, CASE, real-data, derivative, and benchmark claims remain blocked unless separately approved.
Evidence gaps visible	PASS	Missing external review and missing stronger proof are visible.
Orchestration reality check visible	PASS	The page explains what happened and what did not happen.
External review coverage	NOT_RUN	No external reviewer was used for this implementation patch.
Independent QA coverage	NOT_RUN	QA is local Codex validation only.
Multi-model proof claim prevented	PASS	The page does not claim multi-model orchestration proof.
Production/live/public-proof claim blocked	PASS	The page remains under-construction only.

Benchmark / baseline metrics

These are AIOS operating baseline metrics, not production monitoring metrics. They show what should improve before stronger proof is claimed.

Collection only: no scoring, no export, no benchmark readiness signal, and no benchmark completion claim.

compact_evidence_rows_created

route_model_fit_visible

yes

data_visualizer_review_status

REVIEW_NOT_RUN

qa_visual_review_status

REVIEW_NOT_RUN

opus_critic_review_status

CRITIC_PASS_COMPLETE

reviewer_not_run_count

local_only_validation_disclosed

yes

claim_downgrade_applied

yes

owner_gate_overuse_detected

owner_5_second_verdict_clarity

present

visual_overflow_defect_count

0 observed after local layout safeguards

evidence_gap_visibility

visible

forbidden_claim_scan_result

pending local validation

proof_level

LOCAL_VALIDATION_ONLY

external_review_coverage

independent_qa_coverage

local_validation_present

yes

claim_boundary_enforced

yes

evidence_gap_visible

yes

route_status_visible

yes

owner_gate_visible

yes

public_surface_status

PUBLIC_UNDER_CONSTRUCTION

next_target

add reviewer-gate evidence or external review coverage before claiming stronger proof

benchmark_caption

collection only; no scoring, no export, no readiness signal

Human-readable enum translation

Local-only justified

Raw value: LOCAL_ONLY_JUSTIFIED

This task was handled locally because it was bounded and did not claim production, live, CASE, real-data, derivative, or benchmark readiness.

High-risk public surface

Raw value: LEVEL_2_HIGH_RISK

Public surface work needs explicit boundaries, blocked actions, owner gate state, and claim-safety checks.

Public under construction

Raw value: PUBLIC_UNDER_CONSTRUCTION

The page can be public, but it must remain caveated and must not claim proof or readiness.

Local validation only

Raw value: LOCAL_VALIDATION_ONLY

Build, typecheck, route check, and scans passed locally; no independent external proof is implied.

Downgraded unverified

Raw value: DOWNGRADED_UNVERIFIED

Without role outputs or provider receipts, stronger orchestration claims must be blocked.

What this dashboard proves / does not prove

Proves

AIOS guardrail state can be displayed.
Claim boundary is visible.
Route status is visible.
Owner gate state is visible.
Evidence gaps are visible.
Local validation is separated from stronger proof.

Does not prove

Multi-model orchestration.
External QA.
Opus gate review.
Production monitoring.
Live monitoring.
Public proof readiness.
CASE-003 completion.
Benchmark readiness, benchmark completion, or benchmark export.

Data Visualizer quality rules

No overflowing status text.
No clipped enum labels.
No unreadable raw-value-first cards.
Owner-readable interpretation required.
Important status must be understandable within 5 seconds.
Tables must remain legible.
Dashboard should communicate meaning, not just surface raw fields.
A blocked claim must not look like a blocked task; separate task status, claim status, and evidence status in owner-facing UI.

Latest action decision

Current layer statusPASS_WITH_CAVEAT

Meaning: The public surface is approved only as an under-construction review surface. It exposes route, owner gate, claim boundary, evidence gap, and orchestration reality states without claiming production or live monitoring readiness.

Why: The implementation gate is bounded to the committed dashboard data contract v0.3 and must preserve blocked actions, evidence gaps, and public-safe caveats.

Owner to unblock: Owner approval remains required for future route changes that need a new push, production/live/public-proof claims, CASE-003 execution, real data ingestion, derivative authorization, benchmark export, and any expanded dashboard scope.

Next allowed action: No push is currently required to reflect the present under-construction state; any future change re-enters the push readiness gate.

Not allowed yet: Do not claim production readiness, live monitoring readiness, public proof readiness, CASE-003 execution, real data ingestion, derivative authorization, Benchmark Dataset v0.1 export, or deploy a future route change without a new readiness gate.

Public under-construction dashboard implementation gate

Contract

COMMITTED

Implementation

PATCHED_UNDER_CONSTRUCTION

Public surface

PUBLIC_UNDER_CONSTRUCTION

Claim

UNDER_CONSTRUCTION_PUBLIC_SURFACE

Route and owner gate

routing_level: LEVEL_2_HIGH_RISK
route_status: LOCAL_ONLY_JUSTIFIED
reason_code: OWNER_APPROVED_BOUNDED_PUBLIC_UNDER_CONSTRUCTION_PATCH
owner_gate_required: yes
owner_gate_status: OWNER_APPROVED

Claim boundary

Public under-construction operating surface only. Not production, not live monitoring, not public proof, not CASE-003 execution, not real data ingestion, not derivative authorization, and not benchmark export.

public_claim_allowed: no

Role	Worker	Model/provider	Receipt status	Evidence status
Implementation worker	Codex local patch	local Codex session	not_applicable	page/source diff and local validation only
External reviewer	not run	not_applicable	missing_with_reason	external review not required for bounded local route/page patch before commit readiness
Owner gate	Lyn approval	not_applicable	not_applicable	bounded public under-construction implementation scope approved

Orchestration reality check

Declared static state, not a runtime orchestration probe.

required: REQUIRED_FOR_HIGH_RISK
design: DESIGNED_WITH_CONSTRAINTS
suitability: APPROPRIATE_FOR_TASK_RISK
review: REVIEWED_WITH_WARNINGS
evidence: LOCAL_ONLY_JUSTIFIED
false orchestration risk: LOW

This page may show governance state, but it must not present local implementation work as multi-model orchestration proof.

Evidence gaps

No live telemetry feed is connected.
No production monitoring proof exists.
No public proof claim is authorized.
No CASE-003 execution evidence is present.
No real data ingestion evidence is present.
No derivative authorization evidence is present.
No Benchmark Dataset v0.1 export evidence is present.
No external reviewer was run for this local implementation patch.

Blocked actions

future push without a new push readiness gate
production readiness claim
live monitoring readiness claim
public proof readiness claim
CASE-003 execution
real data ingestion
derivative authorization
Benchmark Dataset v0.1 export
expanded dashboard scope without owner approval

Next allowed action

Current under-construction state already reflected in deployed build. Future changes require push readiness review.

Run local validation and create the required Downloads HTML review report before any commit decision.

Historical / legacy monitoring snapshot

Status: historical/legacy, non-authoritative

This section preserves older public-safe monitoring records for context. It may include historical parked/deferred states and should not be read as the current gap-closure register.

CASE-003 awaits separate owner gate (execution status). This is CASE-specific workflow, distinct from NO_PARK_MODE governance.

Records

Pass

Pass with caveat

Fail

Legacy CASE-specific parked

Historical / legacy monitoring snapshot metadata and coverage

Schema: aios-monitoring-public-static-snapshot-v0.3-under-construction

As of: 2026-06-10T14:30:00Z

Snapshot source: lib/aios-monitoring-snapshot.ts

Coverage: Covers selected public-safe status rows and the current under-construction dashboard implementation gate. It does not cover bypassed, pre-enforcement, manually reconstructed, live runtime, raw receipt, real-data, derivative, or benchmark records.

Data contract boundary: Public under-construction surface consuming the committed v0.3 dashboard data contract fields. It is not the full monitoring aggregation contract required for CASE-003 execution or any benchmark export.

What this page answers

Are AIOS routing and enforcement policies being followed?
Are provider, model, token, cost, and receipt signals present or missing?
Are role boundaries and role-chain dependencies respected?
Which historical claims are valid, downgraded, failed, escalated, or parked?
Which role owns the next unblock action?
What is missing before the next phase can safely proceed?

AIOS monitoring model

Telemetry→Observability record→Monitoring rules→Monitoring status→Public review surface

Monitoring is not just telemetry and not just observability. It uses both, then applies rules to decide pass, fail, downgrade, escalate, or park.

Telemetry

Raw execution facts such as model, provider, token, cost, time, validation result, file count, and receipt presence.

Observability

Explainability of the work: task, phase, role owner, route reason, evidence, missing fields, source register, human gate, and claim boundary.

Monitoring

Rule-based classification that uses telemetry and observability records to decide pass, fail, downgrade, escalate, or park.

Review Surface

Public-safe visual layer that explains curated monitoring status without exposing raw receipts or private task paths.

AIOS status flow

NOT_STARTED→IN_PROGRESS→closeout + monitor check→PASS / PASS_WITH_CAVEAT / FAIL / DOWNGRADED / ESCALATE / PARKED

Status explanation

NOT_STARTED: Task, role, or phase has not started yet.

IN_PROGRESS: Work has started but no closeout proof exists yet.

PASS: Required evidence exists and checks passed.

PASS_WITH_CAVEAT: Checks passed, but visible limits remain, such as static snapshot scope, partial telemetry, or local-candidate-only status.

FAIL: Required evidence is missing or a stop condition triggered.

DOWNGRADED: Work is useful but not valid AIOS proof.

ESCALATE: GPT/Sararin or reviewer gate is required before proceeding.

PARKED: Historical or CASE-specific not-started status pending a separate gate; this does not override the current NO_PARK_MODE gap-closure register.

Claim status boundary

valid_aios_proof: Required routing, role dependency, telemetry, and closeout checks are present for the task boundary.

valid_aios_proof_for_role_review_tasks_only: Role-review routing was proven for those review tasks only; it does not make the monitoring page complete.

draft_local_only: Useful work may exist, but required proof is incomplete or a stop condition downgraded the claim.

valid_provider_review_with_corrective_cost_cap_gap: Provider review is real and receipted, but the run keeps a corrective caveat about cost-cap timing.

no_aios_proof_yet: No fresh routed evidence exists for this phase/task yet.

Historical / legacy monitoring snapshot records

This section preserves older public-safe monitoring records for context. It may include historical parked/deferred states and should not be read as the current gap-closure register.

Historical layer status: PASS_WITH_CAVEAT for script/file-level enforcement checks only.

Route ledger, telemetry receipt, role dependency matrix, cost-cap pre-call gate, provider receipt rule, and failed-claim checks are represented in the monitoring model. The caveat is that this page is still a static public-safe snapshot, not live runtime telemetry, and token/cost visibility depends on what provider receipts expose.

Provider preflight without cost cap

FAIL

Provider work failed closed when pre-call cost cap evidence was missing.

Why blocked or caveated: Provider-route work must fail before execution when a cost cap is missing.

Missing evidence: cost-cap-receipt.md

Unblock owner: Routing layer / GPT-Sararin cost gate

Unblock action: Create and approve a pre-call cost cap receipt before provider execution.

Next allowed: Prepare cost-cap receipt and rerun provider preflight.

Not allowed yet: Do not call OpenRouter, Opus, Sonnet, or any paid provider.

OpenRouter Opus 4.7 critique gate

PASS_WITH_CAVEAT

A real reviewer gate happened and remains caveated because usage details are partial.

Why blocked or caveated: Corrective caveat: future paid calls need pre-call cost-cap receipt.

Missing evidence: full provider token/cost/model/time details

Unblock owner: Routing layer

Unblock action: Require cost-cap receipt before any future provider call.

Next allowed: Use the review as a caveated reviewer receipt.

Not allowed yet: Do not call this perfect routing proof or benchmark evidence.

Data Team, Visual/UX, and Big Crew review

PASS_WITH_CAVEAT

Role-chain proof exists for the review sequence, but the page still needs a consolidation patch.

Why blocked or caveated: Page is not commit-ready until Data Team, UX, and QA findings are reflected.

Missing evidence: consolidation patch validation

Unblock owner: Codex/local executor for patch; GPT/Sararin for final gate

Unblock action: Patch schema, first-screen decision guidance, unblock guidance, and overclaim wording.

Next allowed: Apply consolidation patch and validate the public route.

Not allowed yet: Do not commit, push, deploy, start CASE-003, or claim monitoring complete.

Phase 0 onward rerun

PARKED

CASE-003 has not yet produced fresh AIOS-routed phase evidence under the new enforcement rules.

Why blocked or caveated: CASE-003 remains not started and awaiting a separate owner gate. This is a CASE-specific execution status, not a parked unresolved governance gap.

Missing evidence: Phase 0 route ledger, role dependency matrix, source/register plan if needed

Unblock owner: GPT/Sararin and routing layer

Unblock action: Approve Phase 0 execution packet after monitoring consolidation gate.

Next allowed: Prepare Phase 0 execution packet only after this page candidate is gated.

Not allowed yet: Do not start CASE-003 rerun or claim prior artifacts as fresh AIOS proof.

Phase / task	Status block	Role chain	Evidence presence	Provider / model	Telemetry	Unblock	Next gate
Enforcement Automation v0.1 Preflight and clean closeout proof drill Preflight can create task records and clean closeout can produce monitor status.	PASS routing: automation proof drillrole dependency: PASStelemetry: PASStoken: NOT_REQUIREDcost: NOT_REQUIREDcost cap: NOT_REQUIREDsource register: NOT_REQUIREDstop condition: CLEARclaim: valid_aios_proof	Codex/local executor Routing layer -> Codex/local executor -> closeout -> monitor check	route ledgerpresent role matrixpresent telemetrypresent providernot_required sourcenot_required cost capnot_required stop checkpresent monitor statuspresent	not_required requested: not_required returned: not_required receipt: not_required	Route ledger, role matrix, telemetry receipt, stop check, and monitor status are present.	not_required Continue applying preflight and closeout to AIOS-routed work.	Use as baseline for future AIOS task preflight and closeout.
Enforcement Automation v0.1 Provider preflight without cost cap Provider work failed closed when pre-call cost cap evidence was missing.	FAIL routing: provider task preflightrole dependency: PASStelemetry: PARTIALtoken: NOT_REQUIREDcost: NOT_REQUIREDcost cap: MISSINGsource register: NOT_REQUIREDstop condition: TRIGGEREDclaim: draft_local_only	Codex/local executor Routing layer -> cost-cap gate -> provider route or fail closed	route ledgerpresent role matrixpresent telemetrypresent providerblocked_before_call sourcenot_required cost capmissing stop checkpresent monitor statuspresent	planned_provider_route requested: not_called returned: not_called receipt: blocked_before_call	Preflight blocked the provider route before call because cost cap evidence was missing. missing: cost-cap-receipt.md	Routing layer / GPT-Sararin cost gate Create and approve a pre-call cost cap receipt before provider execution.	Create cost-cap-receipt.md before any paid provider call.
Enforcement Automation v0.1 Provider task with completed provider receipt Provider-route claims require provider receipts and cost-cap evidence.	PASS routing: provider task closeoutrole dependency: PASStelemetry: PARTIALtoken: NOT_EXPOSEDcost: NOT_EXPOSEDcost cap: PASSsource register: NOT_REQUIREDstop condition: CLEARclaim: valid_aios_proof	Codex/local executor Routing layer -> cost-cap gate -> provider receipt -> closeout	route ledgerpresent role matrixpresent telemetrypresent providerpresent sourcenot_required cost cappresent stop checkpresent monitor statuspresent	provider_route_when_used requested: not_rendered_publicly returned: not_exposed_or_not_rendered receipt: present	Provider route had required cost cap and provider receipt; usage details may still be tool-limited. missing: provider-returned token/cost may be unavailable depending on tooling	not_required Keep provider receipt requirements on future reviewer calls.	Apply the same receipt requirements to future reviewer calls.
Monitoring + Enforcement Plan Review OpenRouter Opus 4.7 critique gate A real reviewer gate happened and remains caveated because usage details are partial.	PASS_WITH_CAVEAT routing: anthropic/claude-opus-4.7role dependency: PASStelemetry: PARTIALtoken: NOT_EXPOSEDcost: NOT_EXPOSEDcost cap: PARTIALsource register: NOT_REQUIREDstop condition: CLEARclaim: valid_provider_review_with_corrective_cost_cap_gap	OpenRouter reviewer Routing layer -> cost-cap gate -> OpenRouter reviewer -> closeout -> human gate	route ledgerpresent role matrixpresent telemetrypartial providerpresent sourcenot_required cost cappartial stop checkpresent monitor statuspresent	OpenRouter requested: anthropic/claude-opus-4.7 returned: not_exposed_by_tool receipt: present	Real OpenRouter Opus review exists, but cost cap was corrected after the call and provider usage details were not exposed. missing: returned_model, token_usage, cost, exact_elapsed_time	Routing layer Require cost-cap receipt before any future provider call.	Do not reuse this as perfect execution proof; keep the cost-cap caveat visible.
Monitoring v0.2 role review sequence Three-role monitoring review sequence Role-chain proof exists for the review sequence, but the page still needs a consolidation patch.	PASS_WITH_CAVEAT routing: local routed role-review tasksrole dependency: PASStelemetry: PASStoken: NOT_REQUIREDcost: NOT_REQUIREDcost cap: NOT_REQUIREDsource register: NOT_REQUIREDstop condition: CLEARclaim: valid_aios_proof_for_role_review_tasks_only	Data Team / Visual Designer / Big Crew QA Routing layer -> Data Team review -> Visual/UX review -> Big Crew QA -> consolidation patch	route ledgerpresent role matrixpresent telemetrypresent providernot_required sourcenot_required cost capnot_required stop checkpresent monitor statuspresent	not_required requested: not_required returned: not_required receipt: not_required	Each role review has route ledger, role dependency matrix, telemetry receipt, closeout, and monitor status.	Codex/local executor for patch; GPT/Sararin for final gate Patch schema, first-screen decision guidance, unblock guidance, and overclaim wording.	Apply the consolidation patch, then rerun validation before any commit gate.
CASE-003 Fresh AIOS-Routed Rerun Phase 0 onward rerun CASE-003 has not yet produced fresh AIOS-routed phase evidence under the new enforcement rules.	PARKED routing: pending route ledgerrole dependency: MISSINGtelemetry: MISSINGtoken: MISSINGcost: MISSINGcost cap: NOT_REQUIREDsource register: MISSINGstop condition: TRIGGEREDclaim: no_aios_proof_yet	not_started Routing layer -> role dependency matrix -> phase worker -> reviewer gate -> human gate	route ledgermissing role matrixmissing telemetrymissing providernot_required sourcemissing cost capnot_required stop checkmissing monitor statusmissing	pending requested: pending returned: pending receipt: not_required	No fresh AIOS-routed CASE-003 phase evidence exists yet. missing: route ledger, role dependency matrix, telemetry receipt, monitor status	GPT/Sararin and routing layer Approve Phase 0 execution packet after monitoring consolidation gate.	Create Phase 0 execution packet under the new enforcement rules.

Governance enforcement checks

Control	Status	Evidence	Why it matters	Failure meaning
Route ledger required	PASS	route-ledger.md	Each AIOS task needs an explicit route, role owner, route reason, and output path before work is promoted.	Missing route ledger means draft/local only.
Role dependency matrix required	PASS	role-dependency-matrix.md	Every AIOS task must classify required, optional, parked, waived, and not-applicable roles before execution.	No role matrix, no AIOS proof.
Telemetry receipt required	PASS	telemetry-receipt.md	Missing model, token, cost, or time fields must be recorded instead of invented.	Missing telemetry downgrades claims and blocks benchmark proof.
Cost-cap pre-call gate	PASS	cost-cap-receipt.md / preflight rule	Paid provider calls must fail before execution when cost cap evidence is missing.	Provider route must stop before call.
Provider receipt for OpenRouter / Opus / Sonnet	PASS	provider-receipt.md	No reviewer/model claim is valid unless a provider receipt exists.	Provider/model claim fails closed.
Source register for Researcher route	NOT_REQUIRED	source-register.md required only when research route starts	Research work must show source, date checked, owner, and freshness before it can support decisions.	Researcher output without source register downgrades or fails.
Human gate separated from model telemetry	PASS	stop-condition-checklist.md	GPT/Sararin approval cannot be logged as model output or provider telemetry.	Gate record must be corrected before proof claim.
Claim downgrade rule	PASS	closeout-validation.md and monitor-status.json	Useful work becomes downgraded or draft-only when proof is incomplete.	Incomplete proof cannot be promoted.
No role matrix, no AIOS proof	PASS	role dependency enforcement	Right worker is not enough; right role chain must be proven before execution.	Task is downgraded to draft/local only.

Token / cost / usage visibility

Token usage
PARTIAL / NOT_EXPOSED depending on route
Missing token usage cannot support benchmark or cost-efficiency claims.
Cost
NOT_REQUIRED for local implementation; NOT_EXPOSED may apply to provider route
Cost claims require provider receipt, quote, or source evidence.
Cost cap
PASS for provider pre-call enforcement rule
Provider calls without a pre-call cost cap fail preflight.
Provider receipt
Required for Opus/OpenRouter/Sonnet claims
Provider/model critique claims fail when receipt is absent or incomplete.
Missing fields
Allowed only when explicit
Missing values downgrade claims; they never become proof.
Provider/tool limitation
Possible
Missing token/cost/model/time may be a provider or tool limitation. It does not automatically fail every task, but it cannot support benchmark, cost-saving, or routing optimization proof.

Role dependency principle

Right worker is not enough. Right role chain must be proven before execution.

No role matrix, no AIOS proof. Missing or unresolved role dependencies downgrade useful work to local draft status until the gate is corrected.

Historical / legacy phase and agent activity

Phase	Role / team	Worker	Status	Output	Next gate
Enforcement automation	Codex/local	local scripts	PASS	preflight, closeout, monitor check	Use on every AIOS-routed task.
Opus critique gate	OpenRouter Opus 4.7	provider reviewer	PASS_WITH_CAVEAT	reviewer output with corrective cost-cap caveat	Future paid calls require pre-call cost-cap receipt.
Monitoring data contract review	Data Team	routed role review	PASS_WITH_CAVEAT	APPROVE WITH REQUIRED DATA CONTRACT PATCH	Reflect schema/unblock fields; full aggregation contract remains deferred.
Monitoring visual / UX clarity review	Visual Designer / UX	routed role review	PASS_WITH_CAVEAT	PATCH_REQUIRED	Move decision guidance and status definitions above dense tables.
Big Crew QA / Reality Checker	Big Crew QA	routed role review	PASS_WITH_CAVEAT	APPROVE WITH SMALL PATCH; local candidate only	Narrow wording to script/file-level enforcement proof.
CASE-003 rerun	AIOS routed crew	not started	PARKED	fresh Phase 0 route packet pending	Await a separate CASE-003 owner gate; this is CASE-specific status, not a NO_PARK_MODE gap closure status.

Enforcement monitoring

route-ledger.md missing -> FAIL
role-dependency-matrix.md missing or unresolved -> DOWNGRADED
telemetry-receipt.md missing -> FAIL
provider/model claim without provider-receipt.md -> FAIL

Cost / usage monitoring

paid provider call without cost cap -> STOP
token or cost not exposed -> allowed only with explicit telemetry caveat
benchmark or comparison claim without usage proof -> DOWNGRADED

Role-drift monitoring

Codex writes Opus critique without OpenRouter receipt -> FAIL
Codex labels local source work as Researcher output without route/source receipt -> FAIL
human gate recorded as model telemetry -> FAIL

Overclaim monitoring

legal/security/finance prep becomes approval -> ESCALATE
draft/local-only work presented as AIOS proof -> DOWNGRADED
monitoring page presented as live production dashboard -> FAIL

Historical deferred / not complete yet

CASE-003 awaits separate owner gate (execution status). This is CASE-specific workflow, distinct from NO_PARK_MODE governance.

Item	Status	Meaning
Live aggregate export	deferred	The public page still reads a curated static snapshot, not a live stream from every task folder.
Full Data Team aggregation contract	required before CASE-003 rerun	Data Team review completed, but the full multi-phase aggregation/freshness contract remains deferred.
Visual Designer / UX approval	patch required	UX review completed and requested clearer first-screen decision guidance and unblock visibility.
Big Crew QA final local-candidate gate	small patch required	QA review completed and requested narrower wording plus removal of private-only public snapshot fields.
Private detail surface	deferred	No private monitoring console is promoted as a public surface.
CASE-003 fresh rerun	not started / separate owner gate required	CASE-003 should not restart until a separate owner gate authorizes a fresh route packet. This is CASE-specific execution status, not global gap parking.

Fail-closed render rule

If a required route, role matrix, telemetry, provider, source, or human-gate receipt is missing, the claim must downgrade or fail closed.

If this snapshot is missing, stale, malformed, or disconnected from enforcement outputs, the surface must not claim AIOS proof. It should show under construction, stale, failed, downgraded, or needs-review status instead.